BRITTE WAS DIE INTERNASIONALE BOELIES VAN DIE WÊRELD!

BRITAIN HAS INVADED ALL BUT 22 COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD, Britain in its long and colourful history, new research has found.

In die lig van die onderstaande navorsing soos verteenwoordig in die boek: “ All the Countries We’ve Ever Invaded: And the Few We Never Got Round To”, van Stuart Laycock, is dit gepas om weer die aandag te vestig op die barbaarse en brutale vergrype van die Engelse tydens die Anglo Boere Oorlog. Vergrype wat teen ons volk gepleeg is in die “Verskroeide aardebeleid” en die dood van 27,000 vroue en kinders in konsentrasiekampe, wat die Engelse aangewend het om die Afrikanervolk tot oorgawe te dwing en waarvoor hulle tot vandag toe weier om verskoning voor te vra. Selfs die huidige volksmoord wat besig is om op ons volk voltrek te word waarin hulle ‘n onmiskenbare aandeel het, word deur hulle ondergeskik gestel aan die verering van die terroris en Kommunis, Mandela en ander mindere oortredings teenoor ander volke aan wie hulle verskonings aangebied het. Ons plaas net een so ‘n opvolgskrywe op dié van wyle mnr. Jaap Marais wat hy in lewe gerig het aan die Koningin van Engeland en eerste ministers John Major en Tony Blair. ‘n Duidelike bewys dat onder die baie dun vernis van beskaafdheid, daar weinig verskil is tussen die Engelse soos verteenwoordig deur hulle onderskeie regerings en die barbaarse volke en hulle leiers van Afrika!

03 MARCH 2010          

Mr. Gordon Brown

Prime Minister of Great Britain

10 Downing Street

LONDON

Sir

I refer to my letter, dated 30 July 2007 to you on which I had no response.  I Accept that the reason for no reaction on my letter is probably not the result of a lack of courtesy and therefore I am including the referred letter and relevant documents in the event that you perhaps did not received it.. 

Listening to the election concerns, intentions and undertakings that both you and Mr. Cameron are citing to the British electorate in positioning yourselves for the coming election, the importance of the emphasis on being proudly British, compel me to write to you again with a copy to Mr. Cameron.  You will agree that the Afrikaner Nation also has a unique and heroic heritage which we proudly honor.

The South African “President” Mr. Jacob Zuma, being invited by your government and received on the third of March in London, ridiculed by the British public and media as a clown, is  part of the proof of the British involvement in the devastation inflicted  in our country since 1994. The “circus” of government in South Africa called a democracy and supported by your government, reflects on intelligence and civilisation.

Quoting South African Police figures of  55 murders per day, more than 300,000 murders have been committed in our country of which approximately 30,000 were  innocent and mostly elderly white people. Innumerous raped white women, our wives and daughters, and immeasurable financial and economical waste occurred since Mandela, a Communist and terrorist,  elevated and glorified by your government to an “icon” which he could never be, came to power with the help of your government!

World leaders closing their eyes for the disastrous effect of demographic ignorance will not only forfeit their governance but also their proud heritage and eventually their nation.

The least that the British government can do is to apologize to the Afrikaner People, as what Mr. Kevin Rudd apologised on16 November 2009, to send youngsters from deprived backgrounds to Commonwealth countries.

Mr. Rudd’s statement came after the British government announced that you would offer an apology to the 150,000 displaced children. The way in which Mr. Rudd apologized, is applaudable.

In apologising to the Afrikaner people, the current atrocities and devastation should be included to clear Britain’s projected intense to have the Afrikaner People wiped out in the genocide that is currently being applied  on us.

Waiting for your reply in the interest of  justice,

Yours sincerely,

Danie .Varkevisser

LEADER AFRIKANER VOLKSPARTY.

Artikel van Jasper Copping:

PS. I include just a few photos as to what we as a civilized nation is experiencing while the world is approvingly looking on.

Every schoolboy used to know that at the height of the empire, almost a quarter of the atlas was coloured pink, showing the extent of British rule.

But that oft recited fact dramatically understates the remarkable global reach achieved by this country.

A new study has found that at various times the British have invaded almost 90 per cent of the countries around the globe.

The analysis of the histories of the almost 200 countries in the world found only 22 which have never experienced an invasion by the British.

Among this select group of nations are far-off destinations such as Guatemala, Tajikistan and the Marshall Islands, as well some slightly closer to home, such as Luxembourg.

the analysis is contained in a new book, All the Countries We’ve Ever Invaded: And the Few We Never Got Round To. Stuart Laycock, the author, has worked his way around the globe, through each country alphabetically, researching its history to establish whether, at any point, they have experienced an incursion by Britain. Only a comparatively small proportion of the total in Mr Laycock’s list of invaded states actually formed an official part of the empire.

The remainder have been included because the British were found to have achieved some sort of military presence in the territory  “however transitory” either through force, the threat of force, negotiation or payment. Incursions by British pirates, privateers or armed explorers have also been included, provided they were operating with the approval of their government.

So, many countries which once formed part of the Spanish empire and seem to have little historical connection with the UK, such as Costa Rica, Ecuador and El Salvador, make the list because of the repeated raids they suffered from state-sanctioned British sailors.

Among some of the perhaps surprising entries on the list are:

* Cuba, where in 1741, a force under Admiral Edward Vernon stormed ashore at Guantánamo Bay. He renamed it Cumberland Bay, before being forced to withdraw in the face of hostile locals and an outbreak of disease among his men. Twenty one years later, Havana and a large part of the island fell to the British after a bloody siege, only to be handed back to the Spanish in 1763, along with another unlikely British possession, the Philippines, in exchange for Florida and Minorca.

*Iceland, invaded in 1940 by the British after the neutral nation refused to enter the war on the Allies side. The invasion force, of 745 marines, met with strong protest from the Iceland government, but no resistance.

* Vietnam, which has experienced repeated incursions by the British since the seventeenth century. The most recent, from 1945 to 1946,  saw the British fight a campaign for control of the country against communists, in a war that has been overshadowed by later conflicts involving first the French and then Americans.

It is thought to be the first time such a list has been compiled. Mr Laycock, who has previously published books on Roman history, began the unusual quest after being asked by his 11-year-old son, Frederick, how many countries the British had invaded.

After almost two years of research he said he was shocked by the answer. “I was absolutely staggered when I reached the total. I like to think I have a relatively good general knowledge. But there are places where it hadn’t occurred to me that these things had ever happened. It shocked me”.

Other countries could write similar books,  but they would be much shorter. I don’t think anyone could match this, although the Americans had a later start and have been working hard on it in the twentieth century.

The only other nation which has achieved anything approaching the British total, Mr Laycock said, is France, which also holds the unfortunate record for having endured the most British invasions. “I realise people may argue with some of my reasons, but it is intended to prompt debate,” he added.

He believes the actual figure may well be higher and is inviting the public to get in touch to provide evidence of other invasions.

In the case of Mongolia, for instance, one of the 22 nations not invaded, according to the book he believes it possible that there could have been a British invasion, but could find no direct proof.

The country was caught up in the turmoil following the Russian Revolution, in which the British and other powers intervened. Mr Laycock found evidence of a British military mission in Russia approximately 50 miles from the Mongolian border, but could not establish whether it got any closer.

The research lists countries based on their current national boundaries and names. Many of the invasions took place when these did not apply.

The research covered the 192 other UN member states as well as the Vatican City and Kosovo, which are not member states, but are recognised by the UK government as independent states.

The earliest invasion launched from these islands was an incursion into Gaul, now France, at the end of the second century. Clodius Albinus led an army, thought to include many Britons, across the Channel in an attempt to seize the imperial throne. The force was defeated in 197 at Lyon.

Mr Laycock added: “On one level, for the British, it is quite amazing and quite humbling, that this is all part of our history, but clearly there are parts of our history that we are less proud of. The book is not intended as any kind of moral judgment on our history or our empire. It is meant as a light-hearted bit of fun.

The countries never invaded by the British:1. Andorra, 2. Belarus, 3. Bolivia, 4. Burundi, 5.Central      African Republic, 6. Chad, 7. Congo, 8. Republic of Guatemala, 9. Ivory Coast, 10. Kyrgyzstan, 11. Liechtenstein, 12. Luxembourg, 13. Mali, 14. Marshall Islands, 15. Monaco, 16. Mongolia, 17. Paraguay, 18. Sao Tome and Principe, 19. Sweden, 20. Tajikistan, 21. Uzbekistan, 22. Vatican City.

Jasper Copping