Verlede week het TLU SA sy jaarkongres gehou. Van die eienaardigste besluite in 'n reeks van onbedagte en bevraagtekenbare besluite sedert die eerste dag vandat TLU SA 'n sogenaamde nasionale organisasie geword het, is gewis verlede week se besluit om 'n grondberaad te hou......
'n Ander aanslag wat klaarblyklik tersluikse goedkeuring van die kommunistiese ANC-regime geniet, staan by die behoudende Afrikaner bekend as 'n volksmoord waarin die Afrikaner in die eerste plek en die Blanke in die algemeen gebuk gaan onder 'n bloedige moord-, roof- en verkragtingsaanslag waarin reeds derduisende mense uitegwis is sedert die ANC die land amptelik in 1994 regeer. Nodeloos om te skryf: hierdie aanslag het 'n vernietigende uitwerking op die stabiliteit van Afrikanergemeenskappe op die platteland.
Verlede week het TLU SA sy jaarkongres gehou. Van die eienaardigste besluite in 'n reeks van onbedagte en bevraagtekenbare besluite sedert die eerste dag vandat TLU SA 'n sogenaamde nasionale organisasie geword het, is gewis verlede week se besluit om 'n grondberaad te hou waar elke Zuma, Mbeki en Mandela sy saak op die tafel kan plaas. Dit staan in dieselfde teken as 'n kantoorberaad by TLU SA in Silverton, Pretoria waar 'n TLU SA- amptenaartjie, Chris van Zyl, sommer met die PAC 'n rondetafelgesprek oor die Afrikanervolk se vaderland gevoer het.
Helaas, dis nie die enigste sake wat die Afrikaner-landbouer en ook die Afrikanervolk tot ernstige kommer hoort te stem nie. Die aanslag op die Afrikaner en sy vaderland is veelvuldig. Daar is die Verenigde Nasies (VN), die VN se voetsoldate in hierdie aanslag saamgetrek in die VN se Konferensie vir Handel en Ontwikkeling (VNKHO), die sogenaamde ETC-groep La Vía Campesina, en in die finale instansie Groot Kapitaal met die vernaamste frontman daar die Jood George Soros. Daar is weliswaar kleiner kapitaalkragtiges, die kapitaal wat hulle aanwend om in besit van die Afrikaner se grond te kom, nie noodwendig eie kapitaal nie, maar langs 'n omweg afkomstig van regerings van onderskeidelik die Ooste en die Moslem-wêreld, die aankoop van grond in ons land 'n poging om vir hul bevolkings voedselsekerheid te bring.
Wat Groot Kapitaal se aanslag op ons vaderland betref: In 'n voorskou oor TLU SA se jaarkongres het die AVP nie sommer net Agbiz se beslissende teenwoordigheid op die kongres bevraagteken nie. En nie om dowe neute gemaan dat Agbiz maar eintlik 'n front van die Joodse kartel Tiger is nie, Tiger wat vandag 'n monopolie op landboukoöperasies in ons land het.
Die ETC-groep La Via Campensina, se leier is 'n Swartvrou van Zimbabwe, ene Elizabeth Mpofu. Wanneer daar gedink word aan die destabilisasie van die Blanke gemeenskap en ook die grondgrypery in Zimbabwe, dink die waarnemer aan 'n Julias Malema-konneksie. Want was Julias Malema, toe hy nog ANC-jeugleier was, nie in Zimbabwe om by ZANU-PF lesse te kry oor die gryp van Blankes se grond in ons land self nie?
Oënskynlik is Groot Kapitaal, en veral Soros, en La Via Campensina (LVC) aartsvyande. Vele van LVC se propaganda is dan ook teen Soros gemik. Dit is egter tog die moeite werd om van LVC se waarnemings kennis te neem, die belangrikste een hoedat Groot Kapitaal in feitlik elke deel van die wêreld besig is om met behulp van kapitaal, van kleinboere en tradisionele boere ontslae te raak, Groot Kapitaal wat inklim om die hef in die hand te kry wat die volgende wêreldkrisis, dit is voedselskaarste (miljarde mense moet gevoed word), betref.
Vervolgens twee berigte waarin u agtergrond vind oor onderskeidelik Soros se doen en late en dryfvere in sy aanslag op landbougrond wêreldwyd en oor die VNHKO:
Corp Watch
January 15, 2013
Hedge fund billionaire George Soros made a fortune betting against the British pound in 1992 and was accused of doing the same against the Thai baht and the Malaysian ringitt in 1997. Today Soros is making a killing buying and selling farmland in South America after converting them to biofuel production. While this has caused the land prices to increase dramatically, the ecological impact is questionable.
Soros has a 21 percent stake in a company named Adecoagro that is worth some $236 million. (Share prices in the company are down substantially to $9.36 from the high of $13.50 in February 2011 although they are well up on the low of $7.44 in October of the same year)
Adecoagro, an agribusiness company based in Brazil, was created in 2002 to invest in biofuels, coffee, cotton, dairy, grain and sugar production in Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay. Over the last decade, the company has amassed 283,000 hectares in land which it is now slowly selling off as the price of the land rises. All told the company has now made $132 million from selling farmland and calculates that it has made over 30 percent a year for its investors.
For example, last month that Adecoagro sold a farm for some 11 times the price that it acquired it for in 2002, according to Agrimoney: A 51 percent share in the company that controls the Santa Regina farm in Buenos Aires province was sold for $13 million by Adecoagro with an option for the unknown purchaser to buy the rest of the company by next June.
Likewise, last August Adecoagro sold its San Jose farm in Sante Fe, Argentina, for $1,212 per hectare, a 14 fold gain over the $85 it paid per hectare in 2002. The company claims that the value of the land has risen as a result of better management of the San Jose farm. "Agecoagro implemented a sustainable production model that allowed it to grow row crops over six percent of the farm and to increase the productivity of the pastures used for cattle grazing," it said in a statement.
The company also points to the sale of La Alegria - a cattle farm located in General Villegas in the province of Buenos Aires - that it bought in 2007 for $5.9 million. Four years later the company sold the farm for $13.7 million after converting it to the “sustainable” production of soybean, corn and wheat using “no-till farming, crop rotation, balanced fertilization and other best practices.”
The question remains: was this the only reason the value increased? Well, it appears that the conversion of cattle ranches into soybean farms has also helped increase prices because of the skyrocketing demand for the crop for the purpose of producing biofuels.
The planting of soy – together with palm and jatropha – has boomed around the world in the last decade because of generous subsidies from governments in Europe and North America who want industry to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels like coal and petroleum in order to meet international obligations to mitigate global warming under the Climate Change convention.
But the environmental gains from soy production are questionable. Tim Searchinger, a former Environmental Defense lawyer, authored a 2008 paper for a workshop organized by the Farm Foundation and the U.S. Department of Agriculture that showed that converting cropland to soy biodiesel production created “dramatically” more global warming than burning regular fuels.
"Prior analyses made an accounting error," Searchinger told Scientific American. "There is a huge imbalance between the carbon lost by plowing up a hectare of forest or grassland from the benefit you get from biofuels."
Activist groups like Oxfam are also critical of the impact of the biofuel rush which they say is pushing subsistence farmers off their land. “(L)and deals driven by biofuel production mean that there is less land available to grow local staples, fruit and vegetables, making it difficult for parents to provide their children with healthy, nutritious meals,” writes the UK NGO in “Hunger Grains” published in September 2012.
There is one factor that has slowed Adecoagro speculation in Argentine land, however. This occurred in December 2011 when the Argentine Senate voted 62-1 to approve a law capping ownership by a foreign individual or company at 1,000 hectares (2,470 acres) in a bid to curb the loss of land to outsiders.
OOR DIE VNKHO: The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) was established in 1964 as a permanent intergovernmental body. It is the principal organ of the United Nations General Assembly dealing with trade, investment, and development issues.
The organization's goals are to "maximize the trade, investment and development opportunities of developing countries and assist them in their efforts to integrate into the world economy on an equitable basis."[1] The creation of the conference was based on concerns of developing countries over the international market, multi-national corporations, and great disparity between developed nations and developing nations.
In the 1970s and 1980s, UNCTAD was closely associated with the idea of a New International Economic Order (NIEO).
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development was established in 1964 to provide a forum where the developing countries could discuss the problems relating to their economic development. UNCTAD grew from the view that existing institutions like GATT (now replaced by the World Trade Organization, WTO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Bank were not properly organized to handle the particular problems of developing countries.
The primary objective of the UNCTAD is to formulate policies relating to all aspects of development including trade, aid, transport, finance and technology. The conference ordinarily meets once in four years. The first conference took place in Geneva in 1964, second in New Delhi in 1968, the third in Santiago in 1972, fourth in Nairobi in 1976, the fifth in Manila in 1979, the sixth in Belgrade in 1983, the seventh in Geneva in 1987, the eighth in Cartagena in 1992 and the ninth at Johannesburg (South Africa) in 1996. The permanent secretariat is in Geneva.
One of the principal achievements of UNCTAD has been to conceive and implement the Generalised System of Preferences(GSP). It was argued in UNCTAD that to promote exports of manufactured goods from developing countries, it would be necessary to offer special tariff concessions to such exports. Accepting this argument, the developed countries formulated the GSP scheme under which manufacturers' exports and some agricultural goods from the developing countries enter duty-free or at reduced rates in the developed countries. Since imports of such items from other developed countries are subject to the normal rates of duties, imports of the same items from developing countries would enjoy a competitive advantage.
Currently, UNCTAD has 194 member states and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. UNCTAD has 400 staff members and an bi-annual (2010–2011) regular budget of $138 million in core expenditures and $72 million in extra-budgetary technical assistance funds. It is a member of the United Nations Development Group.[2] There are non-governmental organizations participating in the activities of UNCTAD.[3]