DIE TOEKOMS VAN SUID AFRIKA

Die AVP het onderstaande artikel ontvang waarin ʼn nugter oordeel oor die toestand in Suid Afrika uitgespreek word. Dit was egter nie moontlik om vas te stel of hierdie wel die oordeel van dr. Marc Faber was nie. Om die waarheid te sê betwyfel ons dit sterk of hy die outeur van hierdie artikel is. Ons plaas dit egter soos wat ons dit ontvang het omdat die inhoud strook met ‘n stroom van sienings wat nou wereldwyd multikulturalisme veroordeel vanwee die gevaar wat dit vir inheemse volke inhou, en dan ook vir die besef dat swart meerderheidsregerings futiel is!

 South Africa –The Future

Dr. Marc Faber, a leading investment and ex South African and a investment guru, tells it how it is.......Interesting Reading… This was published in a UK paper.

 

Dr. Marc Faber, an ex-South African and a leading investment guru, tells it how it is.......

Let us hope he has it wrong -it’s pretty heavy.

 

South Africa-The Future

I expect, like me, you are aware that there has never been a prosperous black-led country, but

perhaps it's just because of "bad luck", or whatever, for that incontrovertible fact.

 

Take Haiti as an example.

Before the black slaves revolted and killed all the whites and half castes Haiti had a GNP greater than most of what is now the USA A. It supplied 60% of all the sugar used in Europe.

Today it is a wasteland. Apparently if you Google Earth the place you see is a sere, brown coloured landscape compared to the neighboring Dominican Republic which is green and verdant.

Twice the USA has occupied Haiti, building roads, ports, hospitals and schools while putting in a functional society.

 

The moment the Americans left they reverted to dictatorship, voodoo, witchcraft, corruption and barbarism. They did not stagnate; they regressed to the primitive savagery of their forefathers. Since the 1960s, when the Congo expelled the Belgians this has been a mirror of African regression, moving steadily southwards until t the example of Zimbabwe.

Once a prosperous, well-educated d exporter of food the population now eats rats to survive.

Will SA go the same way?

There are those optimists who say "No, we have such a strong economy, such sophisticated

Infrastructure, such a talent pool, that we can never sink".

My belief is that they have not considered the root cause of Africa's failure.

A cause that is not spoken about as it is fearfully politically incorrect, and probably illegal to speak about.

That cause is the deficiencies of the black "mentality", for want of a better word.

Are there differences between races, or is race just a meaningless social construct?

Until recently, I believed all race s were the same under the skin variations, and that perceived differences were only the result of f cultural differences. I believed in common and equal l humanity.

But things did not always ring true. Observable anomalies were inexplicable if all men are the same.

Why, under apartheid, did the Indians prosper; become doctors, scientists, educators, merchants and professionals while the vast majority of the equally oppressed black Africans remained hewers of wood? Why can black Africans run, jump and throw better than honkies, but why, out of a billion of them, have they never invented a single thing of any worth? Why have they, collectively, contributed absolutely nothing to the advancement of humanity?

 

Well the physical thing, the running, throwing bit is easily and uncontroversial answered.

Simple, people of African descent (especially the Jamaicans) are genetically better equipped in this regard. Their muscle fibers are different and they typically have 15% more free testosterone than other peoples. Acknowledging this is regarded as racism. Unfortunately, racist or not, that is proven and a fact.

 

Google it and you will find that for over 70 years, in test after test, done by dozens of niversity

Professors and Nobel laureates plus USA government studies, most people of African descent trail other races by a wide margin.

 

Of course I.Q. tests have been attacked, especially by those who perform badly at them, as one might expect them to do. Detractors claim cultural bias, dysfunctional families, past oppression, poor schooling and a host of other reasons for poor black performance, but the professors defend their contention that I.Q. is largely an inherited trait; that differences are inherent, built into a person's inherited DNA.

 

For every argument attacking the validity of these tests they have a host of results confirming their accuracy and typicality. Fascinating stuff if you are interested in reading up on it. The effect of high/low I.Q. has also been studied in depth, with fairly predictable results. Low I.Q. individuals performed badly in social class, family stability, income, educational levels,

Illegitimate pregnancy, single parent families, rate of prison incarceration, rape, violent crime etc. etc. etc.

 

I.Q. measurement measures different facets of intelligence and mental competence. Sadly it is in the absolutely vital sphere of cognitive ability that blacks score worst. This means they score abysmally in things like forward planning and anticipating the consequences of their actions. It is this I.Q. (and testosterone) disparity that is blamed for the fact that African Americans are 5 times more likely to be imprisoned than white (including Hispanic) Americans, 9 times more likely than Americans of Asiatic descent. All in line with I.Q. distributions.

Once imprisonments for violent crimes are computed the numbers become stratospheric.

These are American government collated statistics, so pretty accurate. Our government in SA do not, for obvious reasons, publish similar stats, but a pound to a pinch of salt they are even more astounding. So why the lecture on I.Q.?